Friday, 22 May 2026
Est. 2021 · Fashion · Law · Culture · Luxury
Where fashion meets jurisprudence

Or continue with

Member login

You Cannot Sue for Birkin

A brown leather Hermès Birkin bag with gold hardware sits atop an orange Hermès box. In the background are neatly stacked orange Hermès packaging and a brown Hermès throw blanket draped over a white chair.

In March 2024, a class action lawsuit was filed by Tina Cavalleri, Mark Glinoga and Mengyao Yang (the plaintiffs) alleging that Hermès was engaged in an unlawful scheme which coerced its customers into buying other Hermès products (such as scarves, jewellery or home goods) as a pre-condition to purchasing a Birkin (or Kelly) bag. The plaint also underscored that Hermès created a false narrative of scarcity of its coveted bags to maintain “exclusivity”.

To read this post, subscribe or upgrade. Already a member?

Required plan Free, Raven Member

Keep reading — full access

Subscribe to unlock this article plus the member archive.
Cancel anytime.

View plans

Membership BENEFITS

Full posts, newsletters, and everything we publish for subscribers.

  • Full articles and searchable archive
  • Expert insight from our editorial team
  • Member-only updates and newsletters
  • Early access where we offer it

Explore more →

Previous Article

Nostalgia Is My Roman Empire: A Critical Examination of Film Title Recycling

Next Article

Paid or Unpaid Actor? Exploring the Tussle Between Influencer Marketing and the Consumer's Right to Know